[gpaw-users] different convergence properties depending on LCAO guess
naromero at alcf.anl.gov
naromero at alcf.anl.gov
Tue Jul 27 15:37:42 CEST 2010
Ask,
This calculation only ran for 1 hour but it didn't look like
it was going to converge. I used basis = 'szp(dzp)'
http://en.pastebin.ca/1909290
Also, a few comments below:
Nichols A. Romero, Ph.D.
Argonne Leadership Computing Facility
Argonne National Laboratory
Building 240 Room 2-127
9700 South Cass Avenue
Argonne, IL 60490
(630) 252-3441
----- "Ask Hjorth Larsen" <askhl at fysik.dtu.dk> wrote:
> Hi Nick
>
> On Tue, 27 Jul 2010, Nichols A. Romero wrote:
>
> > Ask,
> >
> > Number of Bands in Calculation: 3456
> > Bands to Converge: Occupied States Only
> > Number of Valence Electrons: 6208
>
> Right, that could be the problem. In some systems you need as many
> bands
> as there are electrons. This is probably not the case here, but try
> adding some nonetheless.
Ooh... that's a lot. I thought JJ's rule of them was to add about 20%
extra electrons.
>
> >
> > mixer = Mixer(0.15,3),
>
> Consider using Mixer(0.1, 5, 100.0) or so.
I will give it a try.
>
> >
> > occupations=FermiDirac(width=0.10, maxiter=1000),
>
> It's a bit strange that the FermiDirac is taking that many
> iterations.
maxiter = 1000 is the default. When I use the partial wave expansion,
maxiter = 4000 was needed. But even then it fails to converge.
>
> Could you post the calculation logs? It would be particularly
> interesting
> to see how the density and wfs log10-errors progress.
See the paste bin above.
>
> Regards
> Ask
More information about the gpaw-users
mailing list