[gpaw-users] Test failures

Ondrej Marsalek ondrej.marsalek at gmail.com
Fri Nov 12 16:47:50 CET 2010


And the text output of the ah.py test that segfaults is here:

$ gpaw-python ah.py

  ___ ___ ___ _ _ _
 |   |   |_  | | | |
 | | | | | . | | | |
 |__ |  _|___|_____|  0.8.0.7283
 |___|_|

User: andy at cassandra
Date: Fri Nov 12 16:38:18 2010
Arch: x86_64
Pid:  9225
Dir:  /home/andy/build/gpaw/gpaw
ase:   /home/andy/build/ase/ase  version:  3.5.0
numpy: /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/numpy
units: Angstrom and eV
Using default value for grid spacing.

Memory estimate
---------------
Calculator  110.71 MiB
    Initial overhead  101.52 MiB
    Density  2.68 MiB
        Arrays  0.81 MiB
        Localized functions  0.48 MiB
        Mixer  0.19 MiB
        Interpolator  1.20 MiB
    Hamiltonian  4.04 MiB
        Arrays  0.53 MiB
        Restrictor  0.73 MiB
        XC  0.00 MiB
        Poisson  2.30 MiB
        vbar  0.48 MiB
    Wavefunctions  2.48 MiB
        Arrays psit_nG  1.00 MiB
        Eigensolver  0.81 MiB
        Projectors  0.00 MiB
        Overlap op  0.50 MiB
        Kinetic operator  0.16 MiB
[cassandra:09225] *** Process received signal ***
[cassandra:09225] Signal: Segmentation fault (11)
[cassandra:09225] Signal code:  (128)
[cassandra:09225] Failing at address: (nil)
[cassandra:09225] [ 0] /lib/libpthread.so.0(+0xfb40) [0x7fd5c1cceb40]
[cassandra:09225] [ 1]
/opt/intel/Compiler/11.1/073/mkl/lib/em64t/libmkl_mc.so(mkl_blas_ztrsm_lun+0x9fd)
[0x7fd5c3a762fd]
[cassandra:09225] *** End of error message ***
Segmentation fault


On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 14:15, Ondrej Marsalek
<ondrej.marsalek at gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I am trying to build and run GPAW (trunk as well as 0.7.2) on a Core
> i7 with Intel MKL 11.1.073. I have tried with both gcc and icc as the
> compiler. Many tests fail and in the end I get a segmentation fault in
> both cases, although the details look different. I attach the test log
> and my customize.py.
>
> I would be grateful for any hints on what might be wrong here.
>
> Thanks,
> Ondrej
>


More information about the gpaw-users mailing list