[gpaw-users] Test failures
Ondrej Marsalek
ondrej.marsalek at gmail.com
Mon Nov 15 10:30:14 CET 2010
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:17, Marcin Dulak <Marcin.Dulak at fysik.dtu.dk> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> first thing - avoid icc, i usually have problems with it.
Thanks for the warning. I've had trouble with Intel compilers with
other software, but thought that with GPAW it was OK. Is anyone using
icc with GPAW? If so, what version?
> With gcc: the failure of numpy_zdotc_graphite.py is usually a sign
> that there is a problem of gpaw-python/numpy linked blas:
> if your numpy built also with mkl - try to build it with default blas (and
> lapack) coming from numpy source.
> It will less inefficient, but probably work correctly.
Interesting. I am using the distribution-provided numpy that comes
with Ubuntu 10.10:
Python 2.6.6
numpy 1.3.0
Any other ideas for what to test or how to approach this? Thanks a lot,
Ondrej
> Marcin
>
> Ondrej Marsalek wrote:
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I am trying to build and run GPAW (trunk as well as 0.7.2) on a Core
>> i7 with Intel MKL 11.1.073. I have tried with both gcc and icc as the
>> compiler. Many tests fail and in the end I get a segmentation fault in
>> both cases, although the details look different. I attach the test log
>> and my customize.py.
>>
>> I would be grateful for any hints on what might be wrong here.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ondrej
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gpaw-users mailing list
>> gpaw-users at listserv.fysik.dtu.dk
>> https://listserv.fysik.dtu.dk/mailman/listinfo/gpaw-users
>
> --
> ***********************************
>
> Marcin Dulak
> Technical University of Denmark
> Department of Physics
> Building 307, Room 229
> DK-2800 Kongens Lyngby
> Denmark
> Tel.: (+45) 4525 3157
> Fax.: (+45) 4593 2399
> email: Marcin.Dulak at fysik.dtu.dk
>
> ***********************************
>
>
More information about the gpaw-users
mailing list