[gpaw-users] Ni in a box doesn't convergence and spin-polarized set-up
Jess Wellendorff
jesswe at fysik.dtu.dk
Mon Dec 12 20:30:34 CET 2011
Hi Nichols,
atomic Ni can be really hard to converge.
I have managed to get it to converge reasonably well using
a non-cubic cell and translating it away from its "centered" position:
h = 0.13
gpts= 116
ni = Atoms('Niø)
ni.set_cell([h*gpts, h*(gpts-4), h*(gpts+4)])
ni.center()
ni.translate([2.*h/5,2.*h/5,2.*h/5])
still, i need around 600 scf iterations to converge
the electronic structure with the GPAW setting
convergence = {'energy':1.e-4, 'eigenstates':1.e-6, 'density':1.e-3}
The density seems to be the hardest quantity to converge....
- Jess Wellendorff
On 12/12/2011 10:49 AM, Nichols A. Romero wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Two related questions:
> 1. We tried to converge a Ni atom in a box and tried every combination
> of parameters we could think of, but we never got it to converge.
> Can someone send me an input file that works for an isolated Ni atom?
>
> 2. Can the set-up generator created a set-up based on a spin-polarized
> configuration (instead of spin-paired)? I modified the default value
> of spinpol in aeatom.py (AllElectronAtom constructor), but it still
> didn't seem to work.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Nichols A. Romero, Ph.D.
> Argonne Leadership Computing Facility
> Argonne National Laboratory
> Building 240 Room 2-127
> 9700 South Cass Avenue
> Argonne, IL 60490
> (630) 252-3441
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gpaw-users mailing list
> gpaw-users at listserv.fysik.dtu.dk
> https://listserv.fysik.dtu.dk/mailman/listinfo/gpaw-users
More information about the gpaw-users
mailing list