[gpaw-users] Ni in a box doesn't convergence and spin-polarized set-up
Ask Hjorth Larsen
askhl at fysik.dtu.dk
Wed Dec 14 16:08:41 CET 2011
Hi
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, Marcin Dulak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> better avoid fractional occupancies.
But does it make sense to avoid fractional occupations here? It seems to
be a more fundamental issue with Kohn-Sham DFT. It's not supposed to
converge at all with integer occupations (unless one artificially fixes
them), so I think a calculation which manages to converge it must be wrong
in some other sense.
Regards
Ask
More information about the gpaw-users
mailing list