[gpaw-users] Magnetic moment of Fe doped RuO2
Zeljko Sljivancanin
zeljko at vinca.rs
Fri Jul 13 15:13:08 CEST 2012
Dear Niels,
> I have diffuculties with understanding the magnetic moment as the magnetic moment of the system is around +10. Is that reasonable for a system with 72 atoms (21 Ru, 3 Fe and 48 O atoms).
the total magnetic moment of 10 Bohr magnetons seems reasonable for you
system with 3 Fe atoms.
You also have significant magnetic moments on some of Ru atoms -
probably at those close
to Fe. Still, I think you should search literature or study other
possible magnetic configurations to see if the ground state
configuration is ferromagnetic (FM), antiferromagnetic (AFM) or even a
more complicated mixed FM-AFM ordering of magnetic moments at Fe and Ru
atoms.
And finally, if you want to accurately calculate the total magnetic
moment, as well as the moments on individual atoms, you should reduce
Fermi temperature in you calculations to a small value (for example 0.03
eV or less).
Best regards,
Zeljko
> >From the latest SCF cycle the local magnetic moments are:
>
> Total Charge: -0.000000 electrons
> Dipole Moment: [-36.67038705 -51.37485681 -0.15775313]
>
> Total Magnetic Moment: 8.998143
> Spin contamination: 6.539730 electrons
> Local Magnetic Moments:
>
> 0 -0.473953579939 Ru
> 1 -0.786368076168 Ru
> 2 0.043198038108
> 3 -0.00362974702833
> 4 0.00832033254542
> 5 0.00836928341703
> 6 0.0186826193645 Ru
> 7 0.0156318573933 Ru
> 8 -0.0115921088635
> 9 -0.00304199642005
> 10 0.00338648467626
> 11 0.00326942702474
> 12 0.685164744241 Ru
> 13 -0.776960407801 Ru
> 14 -0.227732356263
> 15 -0.0135643760359
> 16 0.00570481846552
> 17 0.00573978186435
> 18 0.0490174184398 Ru
> 19 0.0137261580565 Ru
> 20 0.0126267502073
> 21 -0.00212100163558
> 22 0.00293258624114
> 23 0.00282012692881
> 24 -0.526604900476 Ru
> 25 1.03244554022 Ru
> 26 0.0459718081171
> 27 -0.00245317737804
> 28 -0.0451117132773
> 29 -0.0451332221917
> 30 0.0238554637382 Ru
> 31 -0.0274094971813 Ru
> 32 -0.0179163661005
> 33 -0.00495511648204
> 34 -0.00390104913821
> 35 -0.00399852492394
> 36 0.109646152244 Ru
> 37 0.226753683962 Ru
> 38 -0.00449434235312
> 39 0.110277594886
> 40 -0.00326518475319
> 41 -0.0032240369053
> 42 3.87050343038 Fe
> 43 1.23680992828 Ru
> 44 0.0128559039332
> 45 0.207551766306
> 46 0.0137192317566
> 47 0.0135868867978
> 48 -0.434105092444 Ru
> 49 0.206965756537 Ru
> 50 0.00100443427304
> 51 -0.00717563377391
> 52 -0.00591592984374
> 53 -0.0058909837082
> 54 -1.1822184323 Ru
> 55 2.57834072861 Fe
> 56 0.0535453258958
> 57 0.247871564709
> 58 -0.0175534584869
> 59 -0.0174812184022
> 60 0.052915298411 Ru
> 61 -0.444346020367 Ru
> 62 -0.00582454593289
> 63 0.0892228921516
> 64 0.00510053902918
> 65 0.00498603098624
> 66 3.64388988606 Fe
> 67 -0.897832944325 Ru
> 68 0.00937628379377
> 69 0.127821712883
> 70 0.100082402544
> 71 0.100227814195
>
> The unmarked numbers are oxygen.
>
> Does this seem reasonable?
>
> Niels Theis Bendtsen
> Ph.d.-studerende
> FYS-CAMD
> DTU Fysik
> Bygning 307
> 2800 Kgs. Lyngby
> Direkte telefon 45253177
> ntben at fysik.dtu.dk
> www.fysik.dtu.dk
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gpaw-users mailing list
> gpaw-users at listserv.fysik.dtu.dk
> https://listserv.fysik.dtu.dk/mailman/listinfo/gpaw-users
>
>
More information about the gpaw-users
mailing list