[gpaw-users] hund's rule for Ti and V atom
Kurt Lejaeghere
Kurt.Lejaeghere at UGent.be
Fri Nov 22 08:19:27 CET 2013
Dear Jun
I have little experience with atomic calculations in gpaw, but I have
noticed the same in VASP. It is indeed an effect of PBE, which is not
able to predict the correct ground state electron configuration. In
VASP I find:
Ti 3d^2 4s^2: -2.421208 eV
Ti 3d^3 4s^1: -2.620505 eV
V 3d^3 4s^2: -3.163138 eV
V 3d^4 4s^1: -3.585726 eV
Best regards
Kurt
Citeren jun yan <junyan at stanford.edu>:
> Hi,
>
> I calculated with gpaw a single Ti and V atom with hund=True in
> the calculation.
> for Ti I got final magmom to be 4 while Ti shall have 3d^2 4s^2
> electronic shell configuration;
> and for V I got magmom to be 5 while V has 3d^3 4s^2
> The initial guess for the magnetic moments are correct due to hund's
> rule, but during the calculations, the magmons changed and finally
> became 4 and 5 for Ti and V, respectively.
>
> Does anyone have experience with that ? Does it mean DFT(PBE) can't
> give the correct magnetic moment for these two atoms ? or did I do
> something wrong ? Thanks in advance for reply,
>
> all the best,
> Jun
> _______________________________________________
> gpaw-users mailing list
> gpaw-users at listserv.fysik.dtu.dk
> https://listserv.fysik.dtu.dk/mailman/listinfo/gpaw-users
More information about the gpaw-users
mailing list