[gpaw-users] FD vs LCAO vs PW

Jens Jørgen Mortensen jensj at fysik.dtu.dk
Fri Jul 4 09:17:57 CEST 2014


On 07/04/2014 01:25 AM, Ask Hjorth Larsen wrote:
> Hi JJ
>
> The commit seems to revert a recent change to the documentation of 
> hgh.  Is this an accident?

Yes. Fixed now.

Jens Jørgen

>
> Best regards
> Ask
>
>
> 2014-07-01 20:13 GMT+02:00 Ask Hjorth Larsen <asklarsen at gmail.com 
> <mailto:asklarsen at gmail.com>>:
>
>     Hi
>
>     Thank you very much.  It's all quite fine with me.
>
>     Best regards
>     Ask
>
>
>     2014-07-01 9:44 GMT+02:00 Jens Jørgen Mortensen
>     <jensj at fysik.dtu.dk <mailto:jensj at fysik.dtu.dk>>:
>
>         On 07/01/2014 09:03 AM, Michael Walter wrote:
>>         Dear Ask,
>>
>>         would it be possible to put your nice summary to the gpaw-web
>>         pages ? This could be useful for others and such thinks are
>>         not easy to find in email conversations.
>
>
>         After seeing Roberts email yesterday, I started to write
>         something for the web-page:
>
>         ###################################################
>         The following table can guide you in choosing the right mode,
>         but you
>         better run some tests yourself also.
>
>         ======================  =====  =========== =========
>                                 FD     LCAO         PW
>         ======================  =====  =========== =========
>         memory consumption      large  small medium
>         speed for small system  slow   fast         fast
>         speed for large system  fast   very fast    slow
>         Absolute convergence    easy   complicated  very easy
>         ======================  =====  =========== =========
>
>         With LCAO, it can be hard to reach the complete basis-set
>         limit and get absolute
>         convergence of energies, whereas with FD and PW mode it is
>         quite easy to do
>         by decreasing the grid spacing or increasing the plane-wave
>         cutoff energy.
>         ##################################################
>
>         But seeing Ask's brilliant reply, I also think that it would
>         be valuable to have that on the web-page.
>
>         Ask: Should I commit my piece and then you can add to it?
>
>         Jens Jørgen
>
>
>>
>>         Best,
>>         Michael
>>
>>
>>         2014-06-30 21:53 GMT+02:00 Ask Hjorth Larsen
>>         <asklarsen at gmail.com <mailto:asklarsen at gmail.com>>:
>>
>>             Hi Robert!
>>
>>             Generally:
>>
>>             LCAO has the advantage over FD/PW that it's fast for
>>             larger systems since you have fewer degrees of freedom in
>>             the diagonalization.
>>
>>             FD/PW have the advantage over LCAO that it's easy to
>>             crank up the precision by setting grid spacing or
>>             planewave cutoff.
>>
>>             PW has the advantage over FD that planewaves are "nice"
>>             (they tend to better represent wavefunctions) and you
>>             need less to have a reasonable representation.  Also the
>>             planewaves don't suffer egg-box effect like grid points
>>             do.  Apparently stuff like response calculations are much
>>             nicer in PW mode.
>>
>>             FD has the advantage over PW that you can throw many CPUs
>>             at domain decomposition.  In PW, you can only parallelize
>>             over k-points/spins/bands.  If you want do do many
>>             hundreds of atoms, PW would therefore be less useful.
>>
>>             PW is extremely efficient for small-ish periodic systems.
>>
>>             In GPAW specifically:
>>
>>             PW has the slight disadvantage that it's new-ish and thus
>>             more prone to things not working.
>>
>>             I think PW is still the only mode that implements the
>>             stress tensor.
>>
>>             LCAO has the slight disadvantage that it's quite
>>             different from the two other modes, and e.g. some
>>             advanced functionals have not been implemented with LCAO.
>>
>>             LCAO is very inefficient for systems where the cell is
>>             smaller than the basis functions.
>>
>>             Did I leave anything out? Any questions?
>>
>>             Best regards
>>             Ask
>>
>>
>>
>>             2014-06-30 17:48 GMT+02:00 Robert Warmbier
>>             <Robert.Warmbier at wits.ac.za
>>             <mailto:Robert.Warmbier at wits.ac.za>>:
>>
>>                 Dear GPAW users and developers,
>>
>>                 I was wondering if someone could provide a
>>                 comparative pro/con list for the different modes GPAW
>>                 supports. There is very little information on the
>>                 GPAW website, as far as I could find.
>>                 If there is already information and I missed it, I am
>>                 sorry.
>>
>>                 Best Robert
>>
>>                 This communication is intended for the addressee
>>                 only. It is confidential. If you have received this
>>                 communication in error, please notify us immediately
>>                 and destroy the original message. You may not copy or
>>                 disseminate this communication without the permission
>>                 of the University. Only authorised signatories are
>>                 competent to enter into agreements on behalf of the
>>                 University and recipients are thus advised that the
>>                 content of this message may not be legally binding on
>>                 the University and may contain the personal views and
>>                 opinions of the author, which are not necessarily the
>>                 views and opinions of The University of the
>>                 Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. All agreements between
>>                 the University and outsiders are subject to South
>>                 African Law unless the University agrees in writing
>>                 to the contrary.
>>
>>
>>                 _______________________________________________
>>                 gpaw-users mailing list
>>                 gpaw-users at listserv.fysik.dtu.dk
>>                 <mailto:gpaw-users at listserv.fysik.dtu.dk>
>>                 https://listserv.fysik.dtu.dk/mailman/listinfo/gpaw-users
>>
>>
>>
>>             _______________________________________________
>>             gpaw-users mailing list
>>             gpaw-users at listserv.fysik.dtu.dk
>>             <mailto:gpaw-users at listserv.fysik.dtu.dk>
>>             https://listserv.fysik.dtu.dk/mailman/listinfo/gpaw-users
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>         -- 
>>         ------------------------------------------
>>         PD Dr Michael Walter
>>         Addresses:
>>         - Fraunhofer IWM, Wöhlerstrasse 11, D-79108 Freiburg i. Br.,
>>         Germany
>>           Tel.: +49 761 5142 493 <tel:%2B49%20761%205142%20493>
>>         - Freiburg Materials Research Center, Stefan-meier-Str. 21,
>>         D-79104 Freiburg, Germany
>>           Tel: +49 761 203 4758 <tel:%2B49%20761%20203%204758>
>>         email: Michael.Walter at fmf.uni-freiburg.de
>>         <mailto:Michael.Walter at fmf.uni-freiburg.de>
>>         www: http://omnibus.uni-freiburg.de/~mw767
>>         <http://omnibus.uni-freiburg.de/%7Emw767>
>>         publications:
>>         http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=vlmryKEAAAAJ&hl=en
>>
>>
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         gpaw-users mailing list
>>         gpaw-users at listserv.fysik.dtu.dk  <mailto:gpaw-users at listserv.fysik.dtu.dk>
>>         https://listserv.fysik.dtu.dk/mailman/listinfo/gpaw-users
>
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.fysik.dtu.dk/pipermail/gpaw-users/attachments/20140704/6d8c2ec0/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the gpaw-users mailing list