[gpaw-users] Gpaw on taito (CSC)
leonardo espinosa
espinosa.leal at gmail.com
Fri Jul 25 14:04:00 CEST 2014
Hi,
I've have tested different combinations of optimization algorithms with the
option that
Marcin suggested: export OMP_NUM_THREADS=1, and different combinations of
versions of ase/gpaw.
The calculation still crashes with the same error message. I tried other
options such us:
export NUMEXPR_NUM_THREADS=1
export MKL_NUM_THREADS=1
export MKL_DOMAIN_NUM_THREADS=1
export OMP_NUM_THREADS=1
export OPENBLAS_NUM_THREADS=1
export GOTO_NUM_THREADS=1
But nothing, the same error message.
Maybe I should start from the scratch, installing my own version.
However I though that somebody, gpaw user in TAITO can give
me a hand with a script o some hints.
Thanks again and any help with this annoying bug is always welcome.
Best,
leo
---
Leonardo A. Espinosa L.
Postdoctoral Researcher,
Aalto University,
Espoo, Finland.
http://goo.gl/WjBIXv <http://yonk.is/gI3>
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 5:33 PM, Marcin Dulak <Marcin.Dulak at fysik.dtu.dk>
wrote:
> On 07/24/2014 08:39 AM, Jens Jørgen Mortensen wrote:
>
> On 07/23/2014 04:41 PM, leonardo espinosa wrote:
>
> Hi Ask,
>
> Here I attached you the files,
> thanks for your help.
>
>
> It looks like the positions are out of sync on the different cores. I
> think GPAW should return identical energies and forces from all cores.
> Maybe the BFGS algorithm is causing this? If that is the case then how do
> we deal with this?
>
> is GPAW or numpy linked against a multithreaded blas?
> From https://wiki.fysik.dtu.dk/gpaw/install/installationguide.html -
> "Multithreading is not supported."
> For some libraries like mkl,openblas you can disable multithreading with:
> export OMP_NUM_THREADS=1
>
> Best regards,
>
> Marcin
>
>
>
> Maybe GPAW should accept a small divergence in the positions due to
> numerical noise and then just use the positions from rank 0?
>
> Jens Jørgen
>
> leo
>
> ---
> Leonardo A. Espinosa L.
> Postdoctoral Researcher,
> Aalto University,
> Espoo, Finland.
> http://goo.gl/WjBIXv <http://yonk.is/gI3>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Ask Hjorth Larsen <asklarsen at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Leonardo
>>
>> What is the error? Also the logfile.
>>
>> Best regards
>> Ask
>>
>> 2014-07-23 16:23 GMT+02:00 leonardo espinosa <espinosa.leal at gmail.com>:
>> > Dear gpaw users,
>> >
>> > I'm trying to run a simple BFGS optimization of a benzene
>> > molecule on taito cluster (https://research.csc.fi/taito-user-guide),
>> > using different versions of gpaw: 0.9.0 and 0.10.0. I'm having
>> > some problems because after certain number of iterations the
>> > calculation crashes, anybody here that use gpaw-0.10.0 on taito
>> > without problem? Can you supply me with an example that runs?
>> >
>> > I attached you here the files that I'm using.
>> >
>> > Best regards,
>> >
>> > leo
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ---
>> > Leonardo A. Espinosa L.
>> > Postdoctoral Researcher,
>> > Aalto University,
>> > Espoo, Finland.
>> > http://goo.gl/WjBIXv
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > gpaw-users mailing list
>> > gpaw-users at listserv.fysik.dtu.dk
>> > https://listserv.fysik.dtu.dk/mailman/listinfo/gpaw-users
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gpaw-users mailing listgpaw-users at listserv.fysik.dtu.dkhttps://listserv.fysik.dtu.dk/mailman/listinfo/gpaw-users
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gpaw-users mailing listgpaw-users at listserv.fysik.dtu.dkhttps://listserv.fysik.dtu.dk/mailman/listinfo/gpaw-users
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.fysik.dtu.dk/pipermail/gpaw-users/attachments/20140725/f20202ee/attachment.html>
More information about the gpaw-users
mailing list