[gpaw-users] Boundary conditions for poisson solver different for grid and pw mode?
Filip Anselm Rasmussen
fras at fysik.dtu.dk
Fri Nov 28 11:31:11 CET 2014
Dear GPAW'ers
I am calculating the vacuum level of graphene and noticed that it varied
with ~0.3 eV depending on whether I use FD or PW mode. The calculations
seem to be very well comverged, so I plotted the in-plane averaged
effective potential along the z-direction (see attached figures) and
noted that even though I use periodic boundary conditions (even in the
z-direction where I have only one k-point), the slope of the FD
effective potential at the boundaries is not zero as I expected. In PW
mode the slope seems to be zero.
So my question is: Does FD mode use non-periodic boundary conditions if
there is only one k-point along some axis - even though you have
pbc=True for your Atoms object?
Input scripts have been attached. I calculate the effective potential
along z like this:
Veff_z = np.mean(np.mean(calc.get_effective_potential(), axis=0), axis=0)
Thanks,
Filip Rasmussen
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Veff_comparison_zoom.png
Type: image/png
Size: 25920 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listserv.fysik.dtu.dk/pipermail/gpaw-users/attachments/20141128/b18e17e6/attachment-0002.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Veff_comparison.png
Type: image/png
Size: 35943 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listserv.fysik.dtu.dk/pipermail/gpaw-users/attachments/20141128/b18e17e6/attachment-0003.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: gs_LDA_pw600.py
Type: text/x-python
Size: 972 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listserv.fysik.dtu.dk/pipermail/gpaw-users/attachments/20141128/b18e17e6/attachment-0002.py>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: gs_LDA_fd.py
Type: text/x-python
Size: 914 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listserv.fysik.dtu.dk/pipermail/gpaw-users/attachments/20141128/b18e17e6/attachment-0003.py>
More information about the gpaw-users
mailing list